How will museums become more or less like libraries, amusement parks, archives, television and corporations?
The question may not be “how will they change” but “how they ought to change”. It is not technology that is making this necessary but a broader artistic interpretation of contemporary cultural media, of which certain technological practices epitomize.
While we technological artists are often happy to stick a monitor in the midst of a traditional gallery, ultimately, the museum or presenting organization needs to reevaluate what an exhibition means. Contemporary artists’ work often alludes to trade-shows, cyber-cafes, carnivals, archeological sites, nightclubs, etc, and the very structures of presenting context, funding and viewer interaction, should be transformed if museums are to do justice to such new work. The museum could understand itself as a transforming environment (an abstract machine even) which alters its purpose, rules, hours and staffing, for every new exhibition. There should be no sense of dull familiarity for the viewer.
Some exhibits might involve transforming the museum into a high-tech specialty shop in which individual artist’s works might include ‘CDs and browsing displays’, ‘wearable gadgets modeled by mannequins’, ‘bioengineered food products in sealed packing’, ‘t-shirts with artists’ logos’ etc. Perhaps the assortment of flashy commodities could be encircled by coin and card operated interactive works.
Other exhibits might have artists as tour-guides, changing the interpretation of all displayed works, or taking visitors through administrative wings or storage facilities. These tours might involve special headsets with pre-recorded stops, for instance noting the original influences for Duchamp’s Fountain or Gober’s drains while touring the restrooms. The ultimate conclusion of this line of inquiry might involve removing all works from the exhibit space and having the entire exhibit experience created through headset-based tours throughout. While certain aspects of the museum and museology may be voided in this process, their very absence might render such a work as the ultimate mediation on the museum itself.
Less self-reflexive museum exhibits might involve an exploration of new trends in artistic practice, such as collaborations becoming technological research institutions, becoming companies, becoming transnational corporations (perhaps even religious cults). The museum might become a corporate headquarters for a stint, so as to foster the ultimate merges of individual artist groups based on specialization of skills, products and potentials for cultural capital. The exhibit would be modeling a site of corporate power-perhaps catalyzing what had previously been called an art movement, but what now would be better understood as an artist monopoly.
While these are just a few examples of how interesting a transforming museum might be, they call attention to the fact the similar projects are currently being produced by artists, yet have seldom been afforded the proper context to inform and inspire the general public. While electronic festivals afford these works the opportunity to be created, the museum and a more focused thematic, curatorial vision, might afford a better opportunity for such works to really resonate. Lastly it should be remembered that traditional museum spaces are not value of meaning free. Thus, I am not advocating museums to begin to assume specific cultural meanings, rather, just to alter them now and again.
Credits
- Paul Vanouse is an associate Professsor of Art at the University at Buffalo, a research Fellow at the Studio for Creative Inquiry, Carnegie Mellon University and a practising new media artist
- Also by Paul Vanouse…
Read more...
Shaken hands with statues... by Erkki HuhtamoPragmatic Media Philosophy and the Internet by Mike Sandbothe
Remarks on modernity, mobility, nomadism and the arts by Dr Michael Haerdter
Manifesta 6 - a cautionary tale, by Christopher Gordon
Some Thoughts About "New Media" in Quotes by Gordon Winiemko
The Erasure of Technology in Cultural Critique by Belinda Barnet
Leaps of Faith by Denise Robinson
The Myth of the Center by Dr Michael Haerdter
Thoughts on Participatory Art by Yiannis Colakides & Helene Black
In search of a balanced view - by Helene Black
Note
The content of this site is authored and/or edited by NeMe members and other contributing writers.
The material published in this site may include views or recommendations of third parties, which do not necessarily reflect the views of NeMe, or indicate its commitment to a particular course of action.
Copyright
© 2005 - 2010, Paul Vanouse.
4 Comments for "Millenium Museum Journal by Paul Vanouse"
On 23 March 2005, 13:18 Diane said:
I agree with Lee. I would nevertheless like to see the creation of at least one institution with some of Paul’s suggestions being included in their manifesto.
On 25 March 2005, 04:42 Peter said:
The sprouting of a large number of new museums and centers in the past 20 years focusing on contemporary art has been fantastic! They were all designed though with the ‘traditional building type’ in mind. Correct me if I am wrong, but what is suggested here is a new architectural typology which exists in flux.
On 12 July 2006, 02:53 Omar Estrada said:
Museums project, in some way, a "definition" of art.
Where I see the importance of Paul´s reflexions is in the fact that these definitions should be open to the new knowledge of life.
Art, as a form of knowledge, demands and needs this "receptiveness" beyond the customary negotiations that new approaches impose upon institutions.
This is related, not only to the new boundaries and technologies that art explores today, but to art in general.
Museums should be the space where art happens continously, not where it gets older.
On 23 March 2005, 08:36 Lee said:
Your ideas are interesting but don’t you think that they are a bit extreme? Museums are institutions which operate under very strict guidelines and regulations. To implement even one of your suggestions would mean the trashing of all the existing conditions.